![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:41 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I see them set up on the road every once in a while. I can only assume it's some sort of data collection. If they're counting vehicles like many of you are saying, wouldn't an unusual amount of multi-axle vehicles (i.e. semis) throw the count waaaaaay off?
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:42 |
|
I think its a (temporary) car counter. Local gov't/police want to know how much traffic is going down that road.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:43 |
|
It's usually up before construction, so maybe counting cars comparing night and day traffic or soemthing?
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:43 |
|
In the US they monitor traffic volume, in other countries they can be speed traps.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:44 |
|
I think they get the number of vehicles driven over them. For traffic measurements.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:44 |
|
The NSA put them up in 98 I think.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:44 |
|
They're for measuring traffic flow. I think they use air pressure, and measure the number of axles that cross over it.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:44 |
|
They count the number of sets of wheels that pass over them, usually for a traffic/usage study.
They are NOT I REPEAT NOT speed traps. There are only two so that they can identify which direction is having how many cars.
The "outside" lane will register ~2x as many cars, but simply subtracting the "inside" lane's count will reveal the outside's true numbers.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:44 |
|
Collects traffic data and patterns during certain times of the day, a fancy way to count cars.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:44 |
|
Around here, they measure speed based on the time it takes to cross from one to the other.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:46 |
|
They are taking pictures of you and sending it to the IRS using those cables.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:47 |
|
That's why I try to get the high score when going over them.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:49 |
|
They're counters and they're generally used to see when the best time to do construction is.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:51 |
|
But couldn't that be screwed up by how big the wheels are?
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:53 |
|
That would totally make sense... if any city anywhere ever had any intention to actually do construction ! It's like they set up some cones and signs and call it a day.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 20:59 |
|
I think if there is one - then it is only counting. If there are two like in this picture (especially on a one lane road) they can be used to calculate speed as well. They have time and distance between each impact. Easy to do.
I don't think they intend to use these as speed traps but do need the data when trying to examine traffic patterns accurately.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:02 |
|
AIRPLANE FOOD, AM I RIGHT?
Sorry, that's just how I read your comment. I avoid cities like the plague.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:03 |
|
The can't measure speed. Just go with it.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:04 |
|
In the U.K. here, they are used to measure traffic flow on a given stretch of road. There will usually be a large box tethered to a pole or tree at the side of the road where a contractor will collect the readings.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:08 |
|
In SA they're mobile speed cameras.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:09 |
|
Not according to the people I talked to, who were setting it up.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:10 |
|
I suppose it could. I'm sure they take an average based on common tire circumferences.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:17 |
|
There's no way to get an accurate speed measurement out of them. There simply isn't.
Technically, yes, they CAN be used to measure speed (I admit, I was wrong), however, if the primary purpose of a traffic study was speed, they would absolutely not use pneumatic traffic counters.
Source: this scientific paper
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:25 |
|
OK. This from the manufacturer.
The PicoCount 2500 timestamps all hose hits. It can be used for volume studies or for classification/speed studies. The software ( TrafficViewer Pro ) has FHWA and AustRoads classifications schemes built-in, and it allows for complete customization of the schemes or creation of new schemes
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:25 |
|
I am pretty sure this is a form of speed trap in Japan. I could be wrong though.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:26 |
|
Here is the same info from the manufacturer as I posted to vdub.
The PicoCount 2500 timestamps all hose hits. It can be used for volume studies or for classification/speed studies. The software ( TrafficViewer Pro ) has FHWA and AustRoads classifications schemes built-in, and it allows for complete customization of the schemes or creation of new schemes
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:27 |
|
I AM vdub....
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:32 |
|
Nevermind.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:46 |
|
I think small municipalities, like where I live, rely on them because of multi-function and reduced cost over more precise measuring devices.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 21:50 |
|
I only argued because A. the paper I posted, and B. I've literally never seen them used that way. Also, if you run the calculations for how far apart they'd need to be to get accurate speed measurements, it's a lot greater than the 18-36 inches these things are normally spaced apart.
I've stirred enough shit on Oppo today, are we cool here?
![]() 10/28/2013 at 22:01 |
|
Always cool with fellow Oppos.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 22:24 |
|
You seem to know too precisely compared to everyone else... Do you work for the NSA?
![]() 10/28/2013 at 22:40 |
|
We all work for the NSA :p
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:24 |
|
They aren't speed traps in the sense that you will get a ticket if you get caught speeding over one, but if enough people are caught speeding over them, then don't be surprised to see a speed trap cop soon after.